Hannegan v. Esquire, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
Congress has made obscene material nonmailable (35 Stat. 1129, 18 U. S. C. § 334), and has applied criminal . sanctions for the enforcement of that policy. It has *148divided mstilable matter into four classes, periodical publications constituting the second-class.1 § 7 of the Classification Act of 1879, 20 Stat. 358, 43 Stat. 1067, 39 U. S. C. § 221. And it has specified four conditions upon which- a publication shall be admitted to the second-class. § 14 of the Classification Act of 1879,20 Stat. 359,48 Stat. 928, 39 U. S. C. § 226. The Fourth condition, which is the only one relevant here,2…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- United States Ex Rel. Milwaukee Social Democratic Publishing Co. v. BurlesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Houghton v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Lewis Publishing Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.