Legal Opinion

Veeser v. Stenglein

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1946No. Docket No. 23, Calendar No. 43,220PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is a bill for the construction of the provision, hereinafter quoted, in the will of Amalia L. Pryne, who died on October 31, 1930, a resident of the city of Iron River, Iron county, Michigan. The will has been duly probated and administered in part.

After the making of certain specific bequests, which have been paid, the will provides:

‘ ‘ Fourth : All of the rest and residue of my property, of every kind and description, and wherever situated, and including certain vacant property located on Jackson Boulevard, near the Fair Grounds, in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, which I direct to be sold as soon…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toms v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Gardner v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Kirsher v. ToddMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Detroit Trust Co. v. StoepelMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Stillwell TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Peters v. UelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. In Re Trusteeship Created by FiskeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API