Legal Opinion

Berus v. Berus

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action for the annulment of a marriage.

1Opinion of the CourtCohalan, J.

Action, on the ground of fraud, for-the annulment of a marriage. Plaintiff alleges that the defendant represented himself to her as -an honest and law-abiding citizen; and as a duly licensed practitioner at the bar, and that in consequence of these representations she married him. After the marriage, she asserts, she learned that he had been convicted of crime and had served a term of thirty days in a penal institution; that he was not a member of the bar, and that, in fact, because of his conviction, he was ineligible for such membership. There is nothing’ credit*625able in the character and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caruso v. CarusoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API