Sinclair v. Board of County Commissioners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Winona county.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
It is alleged in the complaint that, as directed by Laws 1874, c. 2, amended by Laws 1875, c. 6, c. 8, the defendant, the county auditor of Winona county, bad, prior to May 4,1875, prepared a list of lands delinquent for taxes assessed before 1873, for the purpose of filing the same in the office of the clerk of the district court, on the first Monday of August, 1875, as he intends to do ; that, professing to act under the statutes above cited, the defendant, the board of county commissioners of said county, have designated the Novelty Press, which they style a newspaper,, as the newspaper in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Smith v. PeaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- People ex rel. Dickinson v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1864
- State ex rel. Kellogg v. BishopSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
- Scribner v. AllenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Pearsall v. Commissioners of HighwaysNew York Supreme Court · 1837
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kellogg v. School District No. 10 Comanche Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
- Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Slingerland v. NortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Regan v. BabcockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Farmer v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.