Haight v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.

In the former opinion in this case (97 Neb. 298) three points were decided: (1) That there was sufficient• evidence to support the verdict; (2) that it was not affirmatively shown that certain talesmen were improperly drawn; (3) that a party to a suit cannot wait until after the jury has returned an adverse verdict before raising objections to the qualifications of jurors.

The majority opinion does not consider nor controvert the first point, and, hence, we have the anomalous situation that, although a proper verdict has been rendered, it is set aside on account of a mere irregularity in…