Legal Opinion

Ethanair Corp. v. Thompson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1997No. S-95-527PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Appellant Ethanair Corporation brought this action against appellee Richard N. Thompson contending that he usurped a corporate opportunity through his private dealings. The district court for Lancaster County held that Ethanair could not bring this action because it was a dissolved corporation that had not been properly revived in accordance with statutory requirements. The issue before us is whether Ethanair has the legal capacity to file a lawsuit. We affirm, concluding that Ethanair is a dissolved corporation and is neither a corporation de facto nor a corporation de jure and, therefore,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. World Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Haas v. Bank of CommerceNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. DolanNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Dolberg v. PaltaniNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Estate of Stine v. Chambanco, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Doe v. ZedekNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Giese v. SticeNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Boettcher v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Radecki v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Galyen v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API