United States of America, Community Action Against Poverty of Greater Indianapolis, Inc. v. Robert Defrantz, Sr.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The district court entered a default judgment for $187,000 in favor of the plaintiffs because the defendant, DeFrantz, had failed to appear for his deposition, and we must consider whether this sanction was so disproportionate that the judgment should be set aside. The applicable legal principles are not disputed. Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes the entry of a default judgment as a sanction for a defendant’s failure to show up at his deposition, whether or not the court has ordered him to attend, Rule 37(b)(2)(C), (d); but the sanction is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richard Davis v. Robert H. FendlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Charles E. Hindmon v. National-Ben Franklin Life Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
3Cited by22 opinions
- Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Wanderer v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Wanderer v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Midwest Developers v. Goma Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- John Powers v. The Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.