Legal Opinion

State v. Erickson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1993No. Crim. 920195Published

1Opinion of the Court

496 N.W.2d 555 (1993)

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Orlynn Mark ERICKSON, Defendant and Appellant.

Crim. No. 920195.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

February 23, 1993.

Patrick F. Leier, Williston, for defendant and appellant.

Peter H. Furuseth, State's Attorney, Williston, for plaintiff and appellee.

LEVINE, Justice.

Orlynn Mark Erickson appeals from a judgment of conviction of unlawful possession of drugs entered upon a conditional plea of guilty under Rule 11(a)(2), NDRCrimP, after his motion to suppress evidence was denied. We hold that there was probable cause to issue the search…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Meschke; Concurrence · Walle.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API