Columbia Athletic Club v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1DissentBenton, Chief Justice
Because the principal opinion is contrary to the plain meaning and settled interpretation of the sales tax law, I dissent. The principal opinion’s novel conclusions do not withstand analysis under the touchstone for statutory construction in this state:
The primary rule of construction of statutes is to ascertain the lawmakers’ intent, from the words used if possible; and to put upon the language of the Legislature, honestly and faithfully, its plain and rational meaning and to promote its object, and the manifest purpose of the statute, considered historically, is properly given consideration.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Cummins v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Abrams v. Ohio Pacific ExpressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- City of Willow Springs v. Missouri State LibrarianSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Hagely v. Board of Education of Webster Groves School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. KnappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.