Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Holmes

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 29, 1943No. Docket 149/587PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It is indeed lamentable when those united in their devotion to God, discordantly attempt to sever their accustomed unity in the pursuit of religious worship.

A preliminary phase of the controversy which occasions this litigation came to my attention at the suit of the pastor.Skinner v. Holmes, 133 N.J. Eq. 593; 33 Atl. Rep. 2d819. Upon the dissolution of the preliminary restraint in that cause, these defendants promptly locked the entrances to the church edifice. The present cause is being prosecuted by certain members of the local society. Counsel were induced to abandon the argument of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grupe v. RudisillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  2. Everett v. Trustees of the First Presbyterian ChurchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1895
  3. True Reformed Dutch Church v. IsermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  4. Whitecar v. MichenorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1883
  5. Barna v. KirczowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Confederation Life Insurance v. Morrisville Properties, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Hopewell Baptist Church of Newark v. GaryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. ST. JOHN'S GREEK CATHOLIC CHURCH v. FedakNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API