Legal Opinion
Mathis v. Harrell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 2, 1907No. 190, 191PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Complaint, from city court of Bainbridgc — Judge Harrell. December 11,--1906.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The instrument under which the plaintiff’s cause of action arose is as follows:
“Bainbridge, Ga. Contract between Mart Clothing Company, of the first part, and P. L. Mathis, second part. The Mart Clothing Company is to furnish P. L. Mathis a stock of goods, such as they think best and in such amounts as they think advisable, to do a general business in Bainbridge, Ga., on Water Street, in the Hicks block, to be known as the Bazaar. Said Mathis is to be manager, keep a'strict account of the cash, sales and expenses, remit all cash to the Mart Clothing Company, and to sell strictly for the cash;…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City Electric Railway Co. v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kennesaw Guano Co. v. Miles & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- White v. DotsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Henslee v. Lynes Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Kennesaw Guano Co. v. Miles & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909