Legal Opinion

Lee v. State Board of Dental Examiners

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1966PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

This appeal involves only that part of the court’s order which held the conviction under 21 U. S. Code, sec. 331 (a), was not of a crime involving moral turpitude within the meaning of sec. 152.07 (2), Stats. The board agrees the matter should go back for further proceeding on the second ground.

Under sec. 152.07 (2), Stats., the conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude empowers the board to revoke a dentist’s license to practice and the record of the conviction is conclusive evidence. It is argued by Lee that his conviction under 21 U. S. Code, secs. 331 (a) and 352 (a), 2 cannot be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. State v. BrodsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. RoggensackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Raby v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Eisenberg v. COM., DEPT. OF PUB. WEL.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Sokoloff v. SaxbeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Meriwether v. Crown Investment CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. State v. BlackWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API