Dikeman v. Norrie
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fourteenth Judicial District, Nevada County. The facts are stated in the opinion -of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Sawyer, C. J. :
The plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of the undivided two thirds of certain mining claims, called the “Caledonia Claims,” including flumes, sluices, etc., situate in Hevada County; that an undivided third is in possession of one Wood, and that plaintiff and Wood are tenants in common of the same; that defendant, Horrie, asserts some claim in and to said mining ground, but denies that he has any estate or interest therein; that said plaintiff and Horrie, since July, 1864, and said plaintiff, Horrie and Wood, since January, 1866, have worked said claims in…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Davey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Colorado Mortgage & Investment Co. v. ReesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Murphy v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Cushing v. PiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Southmayd v. SouthmaydMontana Supreme Court · 1881
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.