Legal Opinion

Van Haltern v. Van Haltern

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1958No. Docket 47, Calendar 47,391PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

Two former wives of the late Dr. Harold L. Van Haltern — one is the widow — vie for the bulk of his estate. Each succeeded, in part, below. Neither is satisfied Avith the chancellor’s effort to provide, out of the estate, for the asserted needs and demands of each. Appeal by one (through the decedent’s fiduciary) and cross appeal by the other bring the case Here for new judicial effort, an effort foreordained to be dissatisfactory — as it was in circuit — no matter wbat our decree may provide.

Dr. Yan Haltern’s first marriage, to cross appellant Katharyn C. Yan Haltern, ended in a decree of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pingree v. PingreeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Braffett v. BraffettMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Welsh v. WelshMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Crooks v. CrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aldrich v. AldrichSupreme Court of Florida · 1964
  2. Estate of Kuhns v. KuhnsAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bailey v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Sheneman v. ShenemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Sheneman v. ShenemanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API