Ferman v. Estwing Manufacturing Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Drucker
Plaintiff brought a personal injury action against Estwing Manufacturing Company, herein after defendant, and Nelson E. Wieters. A jury verdict was returned in favor of both defendant and Wieters. The trial court denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial with regard to Wieters but granted it with regard to defendant. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 306) we granted defendant leave to appeal. The sole issue raised is that the court below abused its discretion in granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial against defendant.
While on a camping expedition…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Hall v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Finley v. New York Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Foster v. VanGilderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
- Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. CaruthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Chapman v. Checker Taxi Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982