Legal Opinion

Catalano v. Crosstown Street Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from City Court of Buffalo. Action by Philip Catalano against the Crosstown Street Railway Company. From a judgment of the City Court of Buffalo for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.

The action was begun'in the City Court of Buffalo to recover a penalty of $50 for a failure of the defendant to deliver to the plaintiff a transfer. The complaint alleges that the defendant operates a street railroad along Hertel avenue in the city of Buffalo; that the International Railway Company is the lawful successor of the Buffalo Street Railway Company, and of the West Side Street Railway Company, and as such successor engaged in operating a street railroad in Niagara street in said city; and that said line of the defendant and of the International Railway Company intersect. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Griffin v. Interurban Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. O'Connor v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Lowenstein v. International Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mannion v. International Railway Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1910
  5. Mannion v. International Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schenk v. International Ry. Co.New York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API