Legal Opinion

State v. Koput

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 8, 1986No. 85-2244-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Harold Koput appeals from a judgment convicting him of first-degree murder and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We hold that although Koput’s constitutional rights to counsel and to remain silent were not violated, Koput was denied his constitutional right to a unanimous verdict in the responsibility phase of his bifurcated trial. We therefore reverse the judgment and the order and remand for a new trial.

In March, 1983, a woman was murdered by an unknown assailant. On October 4,1983, Koput spoke to his priest who, with Koput’s permission, called the Milwaukee…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KoputWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. LindhWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MarcumCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. State v. WeberCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  5. State v. BenjaminSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API