Clem v. Evans
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.
It is not necessary to here repeat the statement of this ease made by the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion affirming the judgment of the district court. 286 S. W. 273.
By his suit the defendant in error seeks to cancel a contract entered into by him with plaintiff in error subrogating vendor’s lien on land held by him to a mechanic’s lien held by plaintiff in error. His cause of action is based upon an alleged false promise under article 4004, Revised Civil Statutes 1925, which is as follows:
“Actionable fraud iri this state with regard to transactions-in real estate or in stock in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- James-Dickinson Farm Mortgage Co. v. HarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Minnesota Ex Rel. Railroad & Warehouse CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Hawes v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Prideaux v. RoarkTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Clem v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3Cited by34 opinions
- Scott v. Sebree, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Weatherly v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Sibley v. Southland Life Ins. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
- Seibert v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Lattrell v. Chrysler Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.