Legal Opinion · Dissent

School District No. 4 v. Board of Personnel Appeals

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1985No. 84-343Published

1DissentChief Justice Haswell

I respectfully dissent.

Here the orders of the Board of Personnel Appeals provided in substance (1) that the Forsyth School District committed an unfair labor practice when it declined to pay an increased wage scale under an expired collective bargaining agreement and (2) to “cease and desist” from denying automatic step wage increments under an expired collective bargaining agreement. The majority have denied judicial review of the order on the basis of mootness because a new collective bargaining agreement has been negotiated.

Mootness is a matter of judicial policy, not constitutional law.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. City of Albuquerque v. CamposNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Board of Education of Danville Community Consolidated School District No. 118 v. Danville Education Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API