Legal Opinion
Mack v. Beeland Bros. Mercantile Co.
Alabama Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1925No. 3 Div. 497PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.
One Parker executed a valid mortgage, which was duly of record to appellant, covering the lands upon which was grown the cotton, the subject of this controversy, during the year 1920. Prior to, and on, and continuously after, January 1, 1922, this mortgage was in default, but, except as hereinafter noted, Parker’s possession remained undisturbed.
The said lands were rented for the year 1922 by Parker to one Bush; the said Bush agreeing to pay, on October 1,1922, as rental therefor, 1,000 pounds of lint cotton.
On July 15, 1922, appellee sued out an attachment against the said Parker, which was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Gilman v. Illinois and Mississippi Telegraph Company. Coykendall, Garnishee v. IdemSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- American Bridge Co. v. HeidelbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Comer v. SheehanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Shelby Nat. Bank v. MitchellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- J. Davis and Co. v. Albuquerque Fed. S&L Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Owens v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Ex Parte MackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- First Nat. Bank of Russellville v. WelchAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930