P.A.M. Transportation v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Beth Gladden Coulson, Judge.
Appellants, P.A.M. Transportation and Intercontinental Insurance Managers, contend in this appeal from a decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission that the finding that appellee, William K. Miller, was within the scope and course of his employment at the time he was injured is not supported by substantial evidence. Upon reviewing the record, we find substantial evidence to support the Commission’s decision.
Appellee was employed by appellant P.A.M. Transportation as a long-haul driver when he was injured on March 28,1985. On that date, he left…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Central Maloney, Inc. v. YorkCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- J. & G. CABINETS v. HenningtonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Frank Lyon Co. v. OatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
- Owens v. National Health Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Arkansas Department of Health v. HuntleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Teague v. C & J Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996