Legal Opinion

Clarke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1984No. 84-1380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Judge.

We deny the petition for certiorari under review because we find that the trial court properly found that before the accused can be considered for the remedies provided under Rule 3.213(b) Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, said accused must demonstrate 5 consecutive uninterrupted years of incompetency to stand trial. As the record herein reflects that the defendant’s periods of incompetency had been broken by periods of competency the trial court was correct in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

Until such time as a trial court determines that the defendant has been…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jamison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Downing v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. STATE OF FLORIDA v. CHARLES MORRISDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API