Legal Opinion

Murray v. Charles

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1843PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Whit of Error to the Circuit Court of Greene. This was a motion to cause satisfaction of a judgment recovered by the plaintiff, against the defendant, to be entered of record and to quash the execution thereupon issued.

Read the full summary

Whit of Error to the Circuit Court of Greene. This was a motion to cause satisfaction of a judgment recovered by the plaintiff, against the defendant, to be entered of record and to quash the execution thereupon issued. The facts of the case áre presented by a bill of exceptions, and are substantially as.follows, viz: At the March Term] 1842, of the circuit court, the plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant, for one hundred and sixty nine 80-100 dollars, besides costs; after the court had adjourned and an execution jiad been made out, but before it was placed in the sheriff’s…

1Opinion of the CourtCollier, C. J.

The only; question presented in this case is, whether the clerk was authorised to receive the money due on the judgment so as to discharge the defendant from further liability. In Currie v. Thomas, [8 Porter’s Rep. 293,] which was an action on a promissory note, the defendant pleaded that an action had been previously brought on the same note, and that he had paid the sum due thereon, to the clerk. The court held, that independent of an authority derived from a statute, money *679cannot be lawfully paid to the clerk in vacation, or in any other manner than as the officer of the court in term…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Regions BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Smith v. RedusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  3. Kyle v. MaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  4. Ball v. Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  5. Governor v. ReadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1862

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API