Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Grebel

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 26, 1969No. 6938; No. 49,352PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYesley, J.

This is cm action of contract for the recovery of a sum allegedly due under a tax escalation clause contained in a lease. The defendant’s answer consisted of a general denial and an allegation of payment. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts, summarized below.

The lease in question was executed on July 29, 1966 by Imperial Apartments Corp., whose interest as lessor was assigned to the plaintiff on October 16, 1967, and by the defendant as lessee. The premises were described as apartment No. 7 at 471 Boston Turnpike, Shrews-bury, Massachusetts, and were demised for a term of one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zarum v. Brass Mill Materials Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Hiller v. Submarine Signal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Caissie v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Richard D. Kimball Co. v. City of MedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  5. Rogers v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mister Jay Fashions, Inc. v. BayBank Middlesex, N.A.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981
  2. West v. KendallMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1989
  3. Mister Jay Fashions, Inc. v. Bay Bank Middlesex, N.A.Massachusetts District Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API