Legal Opinion

In re Podell

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.

In this proceeding for the determination and enforcement of an attorney’s lien under section 475 of the Judiciary Law, the motion’ under consideration was made under section 430 of the Civil Practice Act and rule 157 of the Rules of Civil Practice *7by the respondent Lippman to have certain alleged issues of fact tried by a jury. Section 430 provides for jury trial in an action in the discretion of the court of one or more questions of fact arising upon the issues. The matter at bar, however, is a special proceeding. (See Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 4, 5, 7, 8, 430; 3 Fiero Particular Actions &…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. . McDonaldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Peri v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Kenney v. . ApgarNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Matter of KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Cartier v. WilliamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  2. Entenberg v. GoodmanNew York Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API