Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Government Employees Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1987No. 73284PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Judge.

Toxey E. and Mable Rutherford were insureds of Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) prior to the adoption of the *478Georgia Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act (“No-Fault” Act, OCGA § 33-34-1 et seq.). Thereafter, they renewed their policy annually, purchasing minimum coverage. In 1981 they were involved in an automobile accident and their claim was timely paid by GEICO up to the limits of the policy. The Rutherfords brought suit against GEICO for optional PIP benefits. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of GEICO and the Rutherfords appeal.

Decided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stafford v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Allstate Insurance v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunhill HoldingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  2. Dunhill HoldingsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API