Legal Opinion

Zenith Insurance v. Breslaw

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1997No. Nos. 95-56032, 95-56035 and 95-56041PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal requires us to consider the claims of both parties that the district court wrongfully denied them “prevailing party” status and, accordingly, an award of costs under Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the litigation that spawned this appeal, Zenith Insurance Company (“Zenith”) sued Drs. Leonard Breslaw, Jamshid Azari, Mehdi Khademi, Marvin Santos, and Lloyd Tom (collectively “the doctor defendants”) for alleged violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68 (1994). An eight-day trial yielded a special jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Charles N. Schwarz, Jr. v. Harry Folloder, Alexander Grant & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. Baez v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. All American Distributing Co., Inc. v. Miller Brewing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zenith Insurance Company v. BreslawCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API