Legal Opinion

Kanarkowski v. North Braddock Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1945No. Appeal, 63PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiff was seriously injured in a fall on the ice in the cartway of O’Connell Boulevard in the Borough of North Braddock. The verdict for him in this case was set aside by the lower court and judgment was entered for defendant n. o. v. We are of the opinion that the borough was negligent and that plaintiff is not chargeable with contributory negligence as a matter of law. The judgment will, be reversed.

In the light of the verdict these facts appear: O’Connell Boulevard, a paved highway, runs north and south in the borough. On the hill to the west of the boulevard there…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCracken v. Curwensville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Decker v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Bailey v. Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Manross v. City of Oil CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Dean v. City of New CastleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garvin v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Ventura v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API