Legal Opinion

Benavides v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1983No. 729-83PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appeal is taken from a conviction for possession of marihuana in a quantity of 'more than five pounds and less than fifty pounds. Appellant was convicted in a trial before the Court following a plea of guilty, and punishment was assessed at four years. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Benavides v. State, 652 S.W.2d 464 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] (1983).

In his first ground of error, appellant maintains that the statute under which he was convicted is unconstitutional. Appellant contends that the caption of H.B.…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CrispCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Benavides v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  3. Ragan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1983

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. West v. Brenntag Southwest, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
  2. Robert v. Buck and Queen Isabella Development Joint Venture v. G. J. Palmer, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  3. Benavides v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API