Legal Opinion

Fernschild v. D. G. Yuengling Brewing Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment entered upon a verdict for the defendant, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. '

1Opinion of the CourtConlan, J.

The action was brought to ■ recover the amount of two bonds and interest, executed by thé D. G. Yuengling, Jr., Brewing Company, the predecessor of the defendant, and which plaintiff claimed this defendant had assumed and agreed to pay. The defendant denied that it assumed them.. The bonds sued upon are two of an issue of $1,258,000 of bonds, all of which had been secured by a so-called deed of trust or mortgage, pledging the plant and alb of the real property of the brewing company as security for .their payment.

Besides this trust deed or mortgage there were prior mortgages aggregating…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fernschild v. D. G. Yuengling Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API