Legal Opinion

Naldi v. Grunberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 5, 2010PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Friedman, J.

The complaint in this action seeks enforcement of a right of first refusal that plaintiff claims he held for 30 days while conducting due diligence in contemplation of entering into a contract to purchase real property. Defendant Grunberg 55 LLC, appealing from the denial of its motion to dismiss, argues, among other things, that the alleged right of first refusal is not enforceable under the applicable statute of frauds (General Obligations Law § 5-703) because it was memorialized in an e-mail only.1 We reject this argument, reaffirming our prior decisions…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bazak International Corp. v. Mast Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Gram v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Mirchel v. RMJ Securities Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Parma Tile Mosaic & Marble Co. v. ShortNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Bazak International Corp. v. Tarrant Apparel GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Forcelli v. Gelco Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Newmark & Co. Real Estate Inc. v. 2615 East 17 Street Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Martin v. Portexit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Pollak v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. Solartech Renewables, LLC v. VittiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API