Legal Opinion

Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 2, 1966No. P66/326Published

1Opinion of the CourtLandis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., and J. J. Murphey & Co. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and United States v. M. & D. Miller, Inc. (41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960