Legal Opinion
Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided November 2, 1966No. P66/326Published
1Opinion of the CourtLandis, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., and J. J. Murphey & Co. v. United States (44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and United States v. M. & D. Miller, Inc. (41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960