Legal Opinion
State Division of Human Rights v. Stanmor Liquor Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 29, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law (L 1984, ch 83), petitioner contends that the investigation conducted by the State Division of Human Rights (Division) was inadequate because it failed to hold a confrontation conference and thus its determination of no probable cause is arbitrary and capricious. We disagree. A confrontation conference is neither statutorily nor constitutionally required (Matter of CBS, Inc. v State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 54 NY2d 921).
The complaint filed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- MATTER OF CBS, INC. v. State Human Rights Appeal Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- State Division of Human Rights v. County of ErieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Division of Human Rights v. Hatch Associates Consultants, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- State Division of Human Rights v. Sorrento Cheese Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- State Division of Human Rights v. Buffalo Columbus HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- State Division of Human Rights v. WiesnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Singer v. Staff Leasing of Central N.Y., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.