Legal Opinion

Koontz v. Ball

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1924Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

The purpose of the bill is to set aside and annul as a cloud upon the title of plaintiff, a tax deed made to defendant. The decree denied relief, and plaintiff appeals.

Lot No. 18 in Block D of the town of Mullens was owned by Thurmond in the year 1917, and on the 3d day of June of that year he conveyed it to- Worrell, who, on the same day, conveyed it to Slab Fork Land Company; on the 30th day of April, 1921, this company conveyed the lot to plaintiff C. H. Koontz. It appears that the taxes for 1917 were not paid, and in January, 1920, the sheriff sold the lot, and defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . LadewNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Jones v. DilsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Watkins v. EatonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
  4. Roe v. GeigerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API