Legal Opinion

Mule v. St. Bernard Parish Fire Dep't

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 2018No. 2018-CA-0507PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The OWC later ruled that Mr. Mule's right to indemnity benefits had prescribed under the Louisiana Worker's Compensation Act, and that the estoppel exception to prescription was inapplicable. Mr. Mule's claim was dismissed with prejudice.

Mr. Mule timely filed the instant appeal. He raises two assignments of error:

1. The OWC judge erred in failing to calculate the prescriptive period from the date he became disabled under La. Rev. Stat. 23: 1031(E); and

2. The OWC judge erred in holding that the estoppel exception to prescription did not apply.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

The jurisprudence is well settled…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Dupaquier v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  3. Scott v. ZaheriLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Causby v. Perque Floor CoveringSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. Guillory v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bernard Singleton v. Dillard UniversityLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. Succession of Edward A. Horrell, Sr. .Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API