Legal Opinion

Strawn v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 12, 1972No. [No. 139, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.

In the case before us, appellants, Harry and Faber Strawn, docketed a bill of complaint in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, seeking specific performance of a real estate contract they allegedly entered into with Nathan Jones, one of the appellees. The other appellee, Shiloh Baptist Church of Ardmore, filed a cross-complaint asking that an agreement it had with Jones to buy the same land be declared valid and effective. Judge Loveless in considering this matter dismissed the initial bill and held that the pact between Jones and the church was binding. From that ruling this appeal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blondell v. TuroverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  2. Engler v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1905
  3. Lissau v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Posko v. Climatic Control Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  5. Lawson v. MullinixCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walton v. Mariner Health of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Copiers Typewriters Calculators, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1983
  3. Figgins v. CochraneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Sullivan v. MosnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  5. Broadway Services v. ComptrollerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API