Legal Opinion

City of Gadsden v. American Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 18, 1932No. 7 Div. 137Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

2Per curiam

We do not think that the majority opinion is contrary to Cummings v. Merchants’ National Bank, 101 U. S. 153, 157, 25 L. Ed. 903. It is there emphasized that “the bank as a corporation is not liable for the tax, and occupies the position of stakeholder, on whom the cost and trouble of the litigation should not fall. If it pays, it may be subjected to a separate suit by each shareholder. If it refuses, it must either withhold dividends, and subject itself to litigation by doing so, or refuse to obey the laws, and subject itself to suit by the State. It holds a trust relation…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Cummings v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Des Moines National Bank v. FairweatherSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Pelton v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API