Legal Opinion
Bybee v. Oper Der Standt Bonn
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 4, 1995No. 93 Civ. 3164 (SHS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEIN, District Judge:
Defendants Oper der Standt Bonn (the “Bonn Opera Company”) and Gian-Carlo del Monaco have moved to dismiss the amended complaint in this action for lack of subject matter and personal jurisdiction and pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. Plaintiff Luretta Bybee has filed a cross-motion for leave to re-serve the amended complaint. Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint on the grounds of forum non conveniens is granted and plaintiffs cross-motion for leave to re-serve the amended complaint is denied for the reasons set forth below.
I.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Salazar v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Doe I v. State of IsraelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Anglo American Insurance Group, P.L.C. v. CalFed Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Galustian v. PeterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Byrne v. British Broadcasting Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.