Legal Opinion

Andres Armando Garcia Miranda, et al. v. Laura Hermosillo, et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided August 28, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00266Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 ANDRES ARMANDO GARCIA Case No. 2:26-cv-00266-TMC 8 MIRANDA, et al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 ATTORNEY’S FEES Petitioners, 10 v. 11 LAURA HERMOSILLO, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Petitioners obtained habeas relief when this Court held they had been unlawfully subject 16 to mandatory immigration detention without an opportunity for bond. Dkt. 13. Their group 17 habeas petition was brought to enforce the declaratory judgment entered in Rodriguez Vazquez v. 18 Bostock, 802 F. Supp. 3d 1297,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Jeffrey Meier v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Flores-De-JesusCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API