Sanderlin v. Willis

Lumpkin, Justice.

This case was before this court at the March term, 1894, when a new trial was granted because, in our opinion, the presiding judge erred in striking a plea of the defendant al*279leging that there had been a breach of the bond for titles delivered to him by the plaintiff. 94 Ga. 171. Another ■trial was had, which resulted in a second verdict for the plaintiff, and the defendant now assigns error upon the overruling of his motion for a new trial.

The announcement contained in the first head-note is too manifestly correct to require argument in its. support. The real question,…