Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Barrios v. Safeway Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 21, 2012No. 2011-CA-1028Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

|! LEDET, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part with reasons.

I agree with the majority that the trial court did not err in allocating one hundred percent of the fault to the defendant, Darrell Cuti. However, I disagree with the majority’s finding that the trial court’s damage award “for the loss of the dog, Yellow, is supported by the record. The trial court awarded Ellen and Austin Barrios each $5,000 for the value of the lost pet and the mental anguish suffered” due to Mr. Cuti’s negligence. Despite the trial court’s wording of the damage award as a lump sum for both mental anguish…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freyou v. Iberia Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Holland v. TeagueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Heard v. Affordable Movers, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Smith v. University Animal Clinic, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API