Legal Opinion

United States v. Hernandez-Noriega

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 15, 2004No. 04-5037Published

1Opinion of the Court

F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 10, 2005 TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 04-5037 v. (N.D. Okla.) JORGE HERNANDEZ-NORIEGA, (03-CR-17-K) Defendant-Appellant. ORDER ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before KELLY, HENRY, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges. Jorge Hernandez-Noriega contends that the district court committed plain non-constitutional sentencing error when it applied a sixteen-level enhancement under USSG § 2L1.2(a) to his offense level, as required at the time…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. DazeyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Trujillo-TerrazasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API