Fobbs v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of indecent exposure to a child; the punishment, enhanced under Article 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., life.
Appellant alleges three grounds of error, the first being that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence state’s exhibits without the proper predicate having been made. The complained of exhibits were four photographs identified by the complaining witness. After he identified the pictures the following is revealed in the record:
“Q. (By State’s Attorney) And everything out there that day did it look like it does in these…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McFarlane v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Stone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Lanham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Gamblin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.