Legal Opinion
Rodriguez v. Smith
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 22, 1996No. 96-1177PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
673 So.2d 559 (1996)
Miguel RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner,
v.
The Honorable Fredricka SMITH, Respondent.
No. 96-1177.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 22, 1996.
Miguel Rodriguez, in proper person.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for respondent.
Before BARKDULL, GREEN and FLETCHER, JJ.
BARKDULL, Judge.
The petitioner has filed this petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to enforce an order it entered on November 7, 1991. We deny the petition.
The petitioner was arrested in Philadelphia on homicide charges. The City of Philadelphia Police Department…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Walker v. BestSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. BuckelsSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- State Ex Rel. Titus v. PeacockSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sargeant v. Al-SalehDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- INTERN. FIDELITY v. Prestige Rent-A-CarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Hughes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007