Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Jones

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 16, 1991No. 5-89-0525Published

1Dissent

PRESIDING JUSTICE RARICK,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s finding that the defendant was improperly convicted of theft.

As noted in the majority opinion, there is a split of authority in Illinois as to whether or not theft is a lesser-included offense of robbery. I believe that for the reasons which follow, the trial court correctly found that although the charge of armed robbery could not be upheld because of a lack of evidence of a weapon and use of force, a conviction of theft from a person, which had not been specifically charged, was nonetheless proper.

The reasoning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BryantIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. RomoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. People v. BeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. People v. RiversAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API