People v. Jones
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Dissent
PRESIDING JUSTICE RARICK,
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s finding that the defendant was improperly convicted of theft.
As noted in the majority opinion, there is a split of authority in Illinois as to whether or not theft is a lesser-included offense of robbery. I believe that for the reasons which follow, the trial court correctly found that although the charge of armed robbery could not be upheld because of a lack of evidence of a weapon and use of force, a conviction of theft from a person, which had not been specifically charged, was nonetheless proper.
The reasoning…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. BryantIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- People v. RomoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- People v. BeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- People v. RiversAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990