State ex rel. Excelsior Powder Manufacturing Co. v. Ellison
Supreme Court of Missouri
Prohibition. (1) This case, in view of'the pleadings, is to be determined on the facts shown by relator's petition and the exhibits filed therewith.
Read the full summary
Prohibition. (1) This case, in view of'the pleadings, is to be determined on the facts shown by relator's petition and the exhibits filed therewith. State ex rel. v. Guthrie, 245 Mo. 150; State ex reí. v. Caulfield, 245 Mo. 278; State ex rel. v. Lamb,- 237 Mo. 437-; State ex rel. v. Sheppard, 192 Mo. 497. (2) The Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction of a case involving a construction of the Constitution and upon the constitutional question being brought to its attention it is the duty of the court to at once transfer the cause to this court. Constitution, art. 6, sec. 12; Constitution, Amend.…
1Opinion of the CourtWoodson, J.
— This is an original proceeding in prohibition instituted in this court by the relator seeking to prohibit the judges of the Kansas City Court of Appeals from exercising-jurisdiction in a certain cause brought by one Clara E. Liggett against the relator in the circuit court of Jackson county, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by her through the alleged negligence of the relator, and in-which a judgment was rendered in her favor for the sum of $-2000, from which the relator appealed to the said Court of Appeals. The’ relator also asks this *590court to compel the respondents to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Scott v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Kansas City ex rel. Diamond Brick & Tile Co. v. SchroederSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Kettelhake v. American Car & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- State v. DoerriesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
3Cited by1 opinion
- William R. Bush Construction Co. v. WithnellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914