Legal Opinion
Hermann v. New Orleans & Carrollton Railroad
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 22 opinions
APPEAL from the Fourth District Court of New Orleans, Reynolds J.
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice Edstis,
in Hubgh v. the same defendants, 6th An., says.'—
“But the ground on which Grotius, with whom the idea originates, places it, excludes all idea of its forming a part of the civil law, or being the basis of an action. Speaking of the indemnity to be made in .cases of injury, he goes onto state some examples, of what the indemnity, which the party committing the wrong is bound to make, consists: A man who has unjustly killed another, ought to pay the expenses incurred for hi§ physicians, and give to those whom the deceased was bound to support, as his father and mother, his…
2Cited by22 opinions
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Moulin v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Vaughan v. Dalton-Lard Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Kerner v. Trans-Mississippi Terminal R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Manuel v. Carolina Casualty Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.