Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wisniewski v. Rodale, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 13, 2007No. 06-1305Published

1DissentSloviter, Circuit Judge

There is a Wonderland quality about the majority’s enunciation of the inquiry before us: only if Congress intended to create a personal right and a private remedy, may a court hold that an implied right of action exists under a federal statute. I do not suggest that the majority misconstrues the recent Supreme Court precedent. Quite the contrary. The majority scrupulously reviews the relevant decisions in articulating its version of our task. The fact that I arrive at a different conclusion should not obscure the inescapable truth that we are both engaged in an illusory *309errand. The search is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API