Legal Opinion

State of Oregon v. Rice

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.

The defendant was indicted by the grand jury for larceny by embezzlement under ORS 165.005 prior to the statute being amended by chapter 435, Oregon Laws 1955 p. 508.

ORS 165.005, supra, prior to amendment, read as follows:

“Any officer, agent, clerk, employe or servant or any person, who embezzles or fraudulently converts to his own use, or takes or secretes with intent to embezzle or fraudulently convert to his own use, any money, property or thing belonging wholly or in part to such person, which is property within the meaning of ORS 164.310 and has come into his possession or is under his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris Ex Rel. Carpenters Union No. 2573 v. BackmanOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State of Oregon v. MonkOregon Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blair v. United Finance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. DeBruyn v. Golden Age Club of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API