Legal Opinion · Dissent

Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided September 30, 1988No. Nos. 88-7201 to 88-7204Published

1DissentHarry T. Edwards, Circuit Judge

I agree with my colleague Judge Ruth B. Ginsburg that it is only in the “rarest of *231circumstances” that we should rehear a case en banc. Apart from concerns about the drain on judicial resources, the expense and delay for the litigants, and the risk of a multiplicity of opinions that en banc consideration entails, the commands of judicial collegiality require judges on a circuit to trust one another in the handling of panel dispositions. Nonetheless, “rare circumstances” do occur when en banc consideration is necessary “to secure or maintain uniformity of decisions or when a case involves a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API